impure_tale (
impure_tale) wrote2011-06-22 09:16 pm
Entry tags:
171
I would like to clarify a certain issue. There have been debates as to how Edward Sexby would be dealt with after he attacked me in my cabin. At the time I insisted that I would not have the Wardens vote on this for two reasons. The first, which most assume already, is that I would like to decide that myself. The second, and most important, is that I was not about to demand that a system work for me that I spat upon not two hours before I was injured.
I still will not. Sexby has since sent messengers like the craven dog he behaves as to express that he felt it unfair that the decision should be left to me. When two people of the same stature have a disagreement, why should one take authority over the other? I would see more sense in this were the querant not doing so after already deciding that I was guilty and how I was meant to be punished.
No, it's not fair. If we were talking about fairness I would have your last remaining hand, and fuck anyone that dares suggest I wouldn't have the right.
That he would have the audacity to send people and not face me and speak with me as one man professing equality would to another is enough to shake away the layers of medicine and drug. I am angry and my body complains with me.
I have not made my decision. This whining will not induce me to consider more quickly. It is my answer and I shall render it when I wish to.
I still will not. Sexby has since sent messengers like the craven dog he behaves as to express that he felt it unfair that the decision should be left to me. When two people of the same stature have a disagreement, why should one take authority over the other? I would see more sense in this were the querant not doing so after already deciding that I was guilty and how I was meant to be punished.
No, it's not fair. If we were talking about fairness I would have your last remaining hand, and fuck anyone that dares suggest I wouldn't have the right.
That he would have the audacity to send people and not face me and speak with me as one man professing equality would to another is enough to shake away the layers of medicine and drug. I am angry and my body complains with me.
I have not made my decision. This whining will not induce me to consider more quickly. It is my answer and I shall render it when I wish to.

no subject
In the spirit of... all, I offer you a compromise. I will accept you offering the wardens an alternative punishment for myself - one which you have chosen, in addition to the others available to them. It is then down to them, and their authority, to choose which to enforce, but your opinion has clearly been heard and marked, and given an equal chance against other punishments. But it is still reached impartially.
Is that an acceptable compromise? If you still wish not to discuss it, I shall put the suggestion to a neutral party. Mr Narvin, perhaps.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Leave it to someone else.
no subject
I shall suggest it to Narvin as a compromise of position.