I'm torn often, I admit. I know for a fact that all the beatings I ever got in prison never taught me anything. I know I would not want to replicate the kind of punishment I, nor anyone I knew, faced. But that is a personal matter.
But otherwise, there are times and situations where I desperately get the feeling that accounts must be settled and there must be some form of...even handedness, and I know there are scenarios where I would use harsh and undue force to punish someone for their actions. To make them pay. The latter desire has not had cause to come up very often, and when it has done, I have tried to repress it for the sake of the principle of the former. So I understand the thought, but I cannot say I could accept it.
Well, do you actually think he learnt anything from me punching him in the face? Or does he resent me more now than he did before? The consequence might have mattered more to him, but did it get anywhere? Probably not.
Violence is all he knows, I know. I...only knew violence as a means and a solution and just a way of existing for a very long time. But I didn't learn anything from martial punishment, I didn't learn anything from the violence I received in prison. That only taught me that violence is where the power lies.
I guess, the reasoning I would give for not using beatings as a punishment is that no matter how some would understand the consequences better than any other consequences, it serves little other purpose except punishment for the sake of punishment.
Not only because it's morally wrong, but also because it makes us as bad as they are. If you can do it, then any of us can do it. What kind of message does that send to the inmates in general - especially the ones who actually had, and abused, positions of authority in their own world?
If we use violence, it justifies violent retribution on their part too. It justifies other morally rephrensible acts simply by setting a precedent.
The punishment doesn't always fit the means, I guess. It's...I don't know. When a puppy pees in the house, you rub it's nose in it and swat their butt or their muzzle, and yet we're told violence isn't really the answer, that it doesn't set an example. Or, at least, not the right one. It used to be eye for an eye, but I feel like it would only make things worse. That they would feel less human and that's the opposite of what we're going for. We want them to be accepted into society and to behave in an acceptable manner. Beating someone isn't acceptable.
But damn if it isn't hard not to hit them sometimes. They're just so difficult, but where does it really get you? I think I'd feel worse in the long run. I'd be pissed at myself for sinking to the level of response that they often use. We need to re-teach their thinking and reactions, you know?
Wow, I sort of just went off on that one. Sorry, Marquis.
Same filter. He's totally arguing for the sake of argument right now
If you want to instill a sense of empathy into a person who feels none how else do you do that aside from making them feel how they make their victims feel?
Page 1 of 3